September 2011 Archives

Medical Privacy Breach Exposes Confidential Information of 20,000 Emergency Room Patients

September 15, 2011

Illinois medical malpractice lawyers at Pintas & Mullins are warning of a major privacy breach that recently occurred at a prestigious California hospital, compromising the confidential data of more than 20,000 emergency room patients. Private information regarding patients' names, discharge dates, and diagnosis codes was exposed for more than a year on a public site. Improperly exposing sensitive medical health information has serious consequences for patients and health care providers who are legally and ethically bound to principles of confidentiality.

The New York Times is reporting on the security failure at Stanford Hospital in Palo Alto, California, which occurred in September 2010. Although the source of the medical data breach is still somewhat unclear, it appears that a third party consultant, Multi-Specialty Collection Services, lost a detailed spreadsheet containing patient names, account numbers, billing information and diagnosis codes. The spreadsheet ended up on a website called Student of Fortune, a tutoring website that used the spreadsheet to show students how to convert data into a bar graph. The confidential patient information remained publicly available for more than a year, until a patient finally discovered it and reported it to the hospital.

The breach could have a significant impact on the hospital and its patients, particularly because the medical data could be used for identity theft purposes. In light of this risk, Stanford hospital is offering free identity protection services to patients. Fortunately, the exposed data did not include patients' social security numbers or credit card information, but it did include enough personally identifiable health information to create serious insurance fraud concerns.

Sadly, breaches like this one are becoming far too common as more and more hospitals shift to electronic records and rely heavily on outside contractors. Many of these hospitals do not have the financial means available to install firewalls on their computers or use encrypted USB drives. Without adequate security measures in place, patient data is always at risk of being exposed. Records from the Department of Health and Human Services show that the private medical data of more than 11 million people has been publicly exposed over the last two years. Nearly 20 percent of these breaches involved outside contractors.

We understand that all patients have the right to have personal, identifiable medical information kept private. Our entire health care system is structured around principles of confidentiality, which encourages open and honest patient-provider disclosures and promotes public health. Ethical codes also require health care professional to practice patient confidentiality. The American Medical Association sets guidelines encouraging physicians and nurses to safeguard patients' privacy, particularly as the use of electronic health records becomes widespread.

Continue reading "Medical Privacy Breach Exposes Confidential Information of 20,000 Emergency Room Patients" »

$29 Million Verdict Upheld in Illinois Brain Injury Case

September 13, 2011

Chicago medical malpractice attorneys at Pintas & Mullins understand that the birth of a child should be a joyous occasion for the child's family, and it is critical that all available measures are taken to protect infants and their mothers before and after the delivery process. Unfortunately, in some cases, the negligence of doctors, nurses, and other hospital employees leads to serious medical errors that result in life-long birth injuries.

The Illinois medical malpractice case of Arroyo v. United States is an example of a medical mistake that had a devastating impact on the lives of a local family. According to the lawsuit, government-employed doctors at the Erie Family Health Center failed to diagnose and treat a fairly common blood infection that caused a newborn to suffer severe brain injuries. The child, now 8-years-old, is a spastic quadriplegic with cerebral palsy who cannot talk, walk, or even swallow.

As the Daily Herald is reporting, an Illinois federal appeals court recently ruled in favor of the newborn's family and affirmed the district court's ruling finding his doctors guilty of negligence. The court reasoned that obvious signs and symptoms of the neonatal infection were visible early on, and preventative measures should have been taken to avoid severe and permanent brain injuries.

One of the most significant issues in this case occurred when the newborn was released from the hospital. At that time, doctors informed his parents that the child suffered brain damage due to a blood infection that his mother transmitted during birth. However, the doctors failed to mention that treating this infection with antibiotics would have reduced or completely prevented the damage. As a result of this critical omission, the family did not realize that the doctors did anything wrong, and that a medical mistake actually contributed to the injury.

The child's mother finally learned about the use of neonatal antibiotics after she gave birth to her second son more than a year later, and eventually realized that she had grounds for a lawsuit. After a $29.1 million verdict was handed down to help the child's family pay for a lifetime of medical expenses, the government appealed. It argued that the two year statutory time limit had expired, barring recovery in this case.

The appellate court disagreed. Although two years is the standard time limit to file this type of malpractice case, the court found that the clock did not begin running until the family knew or reasonably should have known that the birth-related injury was tied to the doctor's failure to administer antibiotics. This did not happen at the time of the child's discharge. Doctors told the family that the brain injury was caused by a birth-transmitted infection, but said nothing about a malpractice-related cause. They did not explain or even suggest that prompt treatment of the infection could have averted the injury or made it less serious. As a result, the family reasonably assumed that hospital staff did everything they could to prevent harm and did not suspect any other cause.

Continue reading "$29 Million Verdict Upheld in Illinois Brain Injury Case" »

New Illinois Medical Malpractice Website Set to Launch

September 8, 2011

Illinois medical malpractice lawyers at Pintas & Mullins applaud the efforts of state lawmakers, who recently passed legislation granting patients access to a computerized database containing detailed information on Illinois doctors and their disciplinary histories. We believe that the law promotes fairness and responsibility, allowing patients to make informed decisions about their medical providers.

According to the Southtown Star, the database will contain important information about a physician's disciplinary history, insurance information, practice specialties, hospital affiliations, and whether or not they participate in Medicaid. Most importantly, it will also include a list of all medical malpractice judgments or settlements involving an Illinois doctor in the last five years.

Approximately 48,000 physicians and chiropractors will be listed on the site when it launches in November of 2011. The Department of Financial and Professional Regulation is in charge of compiling all of the physician profiles, posting them to www.idpfr.com, and updating the website as new cases are decided. When an Illinois doctor is convicted of a crime, fired, or makes a medical malpractice payment, it will be posted to the website within 60 days for patients to review.

This critical physician information was previously available to patients as part of a medical malpractice reform bill approved by the General Assembly in 2008. The web-based tool proved to be extremely popular, drawing more than 150,000 hits a week. Unfortunately, the Illinois Supreme Court struck down the law as unconstitutional, forcing the database to shut down.

Some medical lobbying groups fought to keep this information shielded from the public, arguing that it does nothing more than provide ammunition for malpractice lawsuits. However, the state ultimately decided that transparency is essential to protecting consumer rights. The Institute of Medicine estimates that approximately 98,000 Americans die each year from medical mistakes. Allowing patients open access to a variety of physician information will aide them in making important healthcare decisions that could dramatically affect their lives and the lives of their loved ones.

Continue reading "New Illinois Medical Malpractice Website Set to Launch" »